Skip to main content
Clinic NAD

An orbital map of the NAD+ literature — the central redox coenzyme at the core, its precursors (NMN, NR, niacin), pathways and consuming enzymes drawn as independent orbits, with what the human trials actually measured surfaced first.

RESEARCH DIGEST / ABOUT

About this NAD+ research digest

A research briefing that maps the peer-reviewed NAD+ literature — what it is, what it is not, and how it is sourced.

What Clinic NAD+ is

Clinic NAD+ is a research briefing on NAD+ (nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide) and its precursors — a sourced reading of the peer-reviewed literature, organized as a map of the NAD+ ecosystem: the core coenzyme, its orbiting precursors, the pathways that build it and the enzymes that spend it. It runs no exam room and keeps no clinical staff; no one here diagnoses, treats, or writes a prescription. Nothing is made, sold, or supplied from these pages — no NAD+, no NMN, no NR, no infusions, nothing.

What the name means

The word "clinic" in the name is a register, not a service. It signals the measured, instrument-panel tone of the briefing — a place where the NAD+ literature is read carefully and logged to source — not a healthcare facility, an IV-drip bar, or a storefront. It holds no clinical position toward any reader. It does not consult, prescribe, infuse, or book appointments. If you are looking to buy a product or undergo a therapy, this is not that site; if you want to understand what the published studies on NAD+ actually measured, that is exactly what it does.

How we source and frame

Every quantitative claim here — every dose, percentage, duration and effect size — is tied to a numbered citation drawn from the published literature: randomized human trials, mechanism reviews, human-tissue studies and preclinical work, listed on the study references and citations page with DOIs and PubMed links. Three lines are kept bright. First, the supplement-versus-precursor distinction: NAD+ itself is poorly absorbed orally, so an oral-NMN or oral-NR study is never described as "taking NAD+". Second, the evidence ladder: confirmed human findings, preclinical findings and honest gaps are labeled as such, never blended. Third, regulatory accuracy: NAD+ and its precursors are dietary supplements, not approved drugs, and IV NAD+ is an unapproved compounded therapy — the briefing reports that status plainly and makes no therapeutic claims.